Regulatory reform

Regulatory reform

<p>Filter knowledge</p>

  • Filter knowledge

    Articles Filtering:

374 Results

Employment: Are you ready for 2025?

Welcome to our four-part series of bite-sized Employment webinars, "Are You Ready for 2025?" In this series, we look at upcoming reforms to employment law which the Labour Government will be bringing in and what employers can do to prepare.

GLI Fund Finance 2025 - Derivatives at fund level

Head of Derivatives & Structured Products Jonathan Gilmour, Partner Joseph Wren, Senior Associate Nicholas Baines and Associate Nick Morgan have authored a chapter on derivatives at fund level in the latest edition of Global Legal Insights' annual fund finance publication. This chapter highlights some key structuring and legal issues that should be considered by a private capital manager thinking about entering into derivatives transactions at fund level as part of its risk management or investment strategy.

Litigation funding: to regulate or not to regulate?

The litigation funding market in England and Wales has grown rapidly in recent years under a largely self-regulated regime but change may be on the horizon in the aftermath of the Supreme Court's decision in PACCAR,1 which prompted renewed public discussion about the funding industry and the extent to which it facilitates access to justice. The government has indicated that it will consider any recommendations made by the Civil Justice Council (CJC), which recently released its interim report on the subject, and which is currently running a public consultation on approaches to regulation.

Shell v Milieudefensie: What are the implications for corporates?

On 12 November the Hague Court of Appeal (the "CoA") released its highly anticipated judgment in Shell v Milieudefensie. The case concerned the question of whether Shell has the obligation to reduce its C02 emissions by 45% by 2030 relative to 2019 levels. The Hague COA concluded on the basis of objective factors that Shell has an obligation to counter dangerous climate change but that this does not mean that Shell must reduce its scope 3 CO2 emissions by 45% (or any other percentage). 

Back To Top Back To Top chevron up