While the familiar mantra of building more homes, faster' continues to pervade the consultation, it does acknowledge the importance of new, diverse, housing which reflects a range of local needs and circumstances- it should not just be about the numbers.
In the context of establishing the minimum number of houses needed in a local area, the new draft NPPF would now require the local planning authority to assess and "reflect" in local planning policies the size, type and tenure of housing needed by older people including for retirement housing, housing-with-care and care homes (our emphasis), alongside the existing categories of those who require affordable housing, families with children, students, people with disabilities, service families, travellers, people who rent their homes and people wishing to commission or build their own homes.
There is no proposed change to the definition of 'Older People' who remain defined as people over or approaching retirement age, including the active, newly-retired through to the very frail elderly; and whose housing needs can encompass accessible, adaptable general needs housing through to the full range of retirement and specialised housing for those with support or care needs.
This is an encouraging step forward for the senior living sector, since the updated NPPF draft text specifically references all 3 sub-categories of seniors housing. This should help to set clearer expectations at a national level around planning for older peoples' housing. It stops short, however, of defining the sub-categories which could have helped to introduce some consistency of interpretation and expectation.
Importantly, while acknowledging the 2021 report by the international Longevity centre, which indicated that there will be a shortfall of 37% in specialist retirement housing by 2040, it does not propose the induction of a requirement that Local Plans include policies specifically addressing the provision of older peoples' housing. That feels like a missed opportunity, particularly given the pace of change required if the planning system is to adequately support (rather than hinder) the level of increased delivery required to meet future funds.