In addition to the changes to company administration set out in this briefing, the ECCTA introduces other changes including a new offence for failure to prevent fraud.
What is the Failure to Prevent Fraud offence?
The offence will apply to qualifying organisations when a fraud offence is committed by an employee, agent or other associated person, for the organisation's benefit, and the organisation did not have reasonable fraud prevention procedures in place. It will not need to be proven that consent or connivance by the organisation existed. The new offence will closely follow the precedent already set by the Bribery Act 2010 and the Criminal Finances Act 2017, which both contain corporate 'failure to prevent' offences.
Who does the offence apply to?
The offence will apply to large organisations in all sectors, with the relevant threshold being met where an organisation satisfies two or more of the following conditions in the financial year preceding the year of the offence: (i) more than 250 employees: (ii) more than GBP 36 million turnover; and / or (iii) assets of more than GBP 18 million.
If resources held across a parent company and its subsidiaries cumulatively meet the size threshold, that group of companies will be in scope of the failure to prevent fraud offence.
Liability can be attached to whichever individual entity within the group was directly responsible for failing to prevent the fraud.
Liability can alternatively be attached to the parent company, if a fraud was committed by a subsidiary employee, for the benefit of the parent company, and the parent company did not take reasonable steps to prevent it.
SMEs should be aware that, under the ECCTA, the Secretary of State can amend the meaning of "large organisation" via secondary legislation, potentially bringing them into scope without further parliamentary scrutiny.
The offence can be committed even if the organisation and the relevant employee are based outside of the UK.
What fraud offences are included in the duty?
The offence is limited to failing to prevent offences under the Fraud Act 2006 (fraud by false representation, fraud by failing to disclose information, fraud by abuse of position, obtaining services dishonestly and participation in a fraudulent business, the Theft Act 1968 (false statements by company directors and false accounting), fraudulent trading under the Companies Act 2006 and cheating the public revenue under common law.
Companies should note that this list of offences list may be updated through secondary legislation in future, although any new offences added would be limited to economic crime.
The types of conduct that could be caught are wide-ranging but, crucially in each case, there would have to be dishonest intent for an offence to be committed intending to benefit the relevant organisation.
What defence is available to organisations in respect of the offence?
It is a defence for the organisation to prove that they had reasonable procedures in place to prevent fraud or that it was reasonable to have no fraud prevention procedures in place (for example, organisations where the risk is extremely low).
The government is required to publish guidance to set out the procedures that relevant organisations can put in place to prevent persons associated with them from committing fraud offences. This guidance is expected to be published before the offence comes into force.
What is the potential penalty if an organisation is convicted of failure to prevent fraud?
If convicted, an organisation can receive an unlimited fine. The government is not proposing to introduce personal liability for directors and senior managers under this offence. Individuals within companies can already be prosecuted for committing, encouraging or assisting fraud under separate offences. The government’s view is that it would not be proportionate to prosecute an individual where they did not consent or know of the offence happening.