The Law Commission carried out a detailed analysis of commonhold which resulted in a report published in 2020 called "Reinvigorating commonhold: the alternative to leasehold ownership" containing 121 recommendations. The White Paper intends to implement the majority of these recommendations, some of which are highlighted below:
2.1 Introducing ‘sections’ to support mixed-use development
Once this amendment has been made to the regime, it will be possible to divide a building or estate into different sections to separate out the management of different areas or groups of units within a commonhold. This would mean that only the unit owners within a particular section will be able to vote on matters that only affect that section, and only those who benefit from a particular service or upgrade will be responsible for paying for it.
2.2 Allowing certain permitted leases including shared ownership
The current legislation does not permit the grant of any leases out of commonhold units if they exceed 7 years or involve the payment of a premium. The Government proposes to amend this to enable shared ownership leases to be granted out of a commonhold title. Shared owners will be able to take part in decisions on the management and costs of running their building and benefit from the rights and protections of the commonhold system.
2.3 More development rights for developers
The legislation will be amended so that developers have more rights during the construction process for the completion and sale of units on the site. Developers will be able to reserve in the CCS the rights that are best suited to the size and needs of their particular development but will only be permitted to exercise these rights for a purpose connected with the completion of the development, or the marketing of the units.
2.4 Safeguards for local rule changes
At present, local rules can be changed if more than 50% of the unit-owners at a meeting of the CA vote in favour of the change – this will be increased to 75%.
2.5 Improved processes for appointing and replacing directors
The Government will implement the Law Commission’s proposals to set out a clear process for a CA to follow when appointing directors, and to include a mechanism to allow interested parties, such as lenders and unit owners, to apply to the Tribunal to appoint directors if no directors (or insufficient numbers of directors) have been appointed. New rules will also mandate an annual election for directors and allow for the replacement of existing directors in cases of mismanagement.
2.6 Insurance
It will be compulsory for CAs to take out public liability insurance and buildings insurance (which is required under current legislation) and optionally directors’ liability insurance.
2.7 Unit owners' repair duties, and rights to make minor alterations
The Government will change the commonhold system so that the CA will be able to vote on the standard of repair required by the unit owners, through setting their own local rule, which (as with all local rules) could be amended or removed at a later point to reflect the experience and wishes of unit owners.
2.8 Agreeing the commonhold budget
Under the new regime, the unit owners will have to vote in support of the commonhold’s budget every year. If a budget fails to pass, the previous year’s budget will roll over.
2.9 Mandating reserve funds
This is a very important provision as it meets many of the historic worries about commonhold. Under the new version of commonhold, it will be mandatory for CAs to establish one or more reserve funds into which unit-owners regularly pay, so that there are funds available to cover unforeseen events and repair costs. The White Paper suggests that the CA could for example set up one such fund for general costs and one fund dedicated to a specific item such as the replacement of the lift after 10 years. These funds will have to be held on statutory trust for these purposes.
2.10 Borrowing for emergency funds
Another new provision intended to ease financial strain on the CA will allow the CA to take out a loan using a fixed charge against the building or a floating charge against the income stream from unit owners' commonhold contributions, or sell parts of their building if necessary. Any such measures would require either a unanimous vote of the CA or 80% support plus the approval of the Tribunal.
2.11 Settling disputes
The Government will introduce new mechanisms into the commonhold system to promote mediation and other out-of-court methods to resolve disagreements. They will not make membership of an ombudsman scheme or regulator mandatory for commonhold at the moment. Unresolved disputes will be referred to the Tribunal.
2.12 Enforcement and recovery of debts
At present, a CA can charge interest on late payments by unit-owners. These powers will be increased to include the ability to apply to the Court for an expedited order to sell a unit if its owner fails to pay their bill to the CA. There will be a minimum arrears threshold so that this power is not abused, and the unit-owner's lender will be granted step-in rights.
2.13 Protection of minority unit-owners
The current commonhold regime does not offer much protection for owners who are outvoted on decisions that impact them. The Government will implement new protection for them to challenge CA decisions by applying to the Tribunal if they feel they have been unfairly impacted, in relation to decisions about varying the terms of the CCS; creating or combining one or more sections; or approving a budget above a cost threshold set out in the CCS.
2.14 Insolvency of the CA
This is another very important provision as it recognises historic concerns about whether commonhold is workable in practice. The Government will adopt the Law Commission's proposals to clarify and improve the process whereby the Court can appoint a ‘successor association’ where an existing CA becomes insolvent. This will allow the new association to assume management of the commonhold so it can continue to operate. The Government will also take forward the Law Commission's recommendations on improving the processes whereby the CA can undergo a voluntary termination where, for example, the unit-owners decide to sell the building to a developer for a profit.