COVID-19

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic continues to be felt across the global business community.

COVID-19

Refine Search

2232 Results

From Manifesto to Budget: Capital Gains Tax: what can we expect from the Labour Government?

In the fourth episode of this series, Tax Partner Hannah Manning, Knowledge Counsel Kulsoom Hadi and Trainee Solicitors Josh Channon and Amar Degon discuss the possible reforms to capital gains tax to be announced in the Autumn Budget on 30 October 2024. The team reviews speculation from recent commentary and delves into past budget announcements, as well as discussing comparisons with CGT rates in other countries.

From Manifesto to Budget: Business taxes: what can we expect from the Labour Government?

In the third episode of series, Head of Tax, Russell Warren, Associate Ross McGregor and Trainee Nadia Ashbridge discuss the possible reforms to key business taxes including Corporation Tax, VAT and Employer NICs expected to be announced in the Autumn Budget on 30 October 2024. The team also consider Labour's manifesto pledge promising a Business Taxes Roadmap and what this might mean for businesses in the longer term.

Outsourcing Spotlight - Autumn - Winter 2024

Welcome to the third edition of the Travers Smith Outsourcing Spotlight. In this issue, we look at the impact on outsourcing of the new Labour Government's employment reforms and the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024.  We also discuss a range of other topics including artificial intelligence, smart contracts and a recent Supreme Court decision on force majeure clauses.

Price parity / Most Favoured Nation clauses come before the Court of Justice

Background to the referral

On 19 September, the Court of Justice ("CJEU") handed down its judgment in Booking.com BV and Booking.com (Deutschland) GmbH v 25hours Hotel Company Berlin GmbH and Others. This case made its way to the CJEU as a reference for preliminary ruling from the Amsterdam District Court connected to a private dispute between Booking.com and a number of providers of accommodation services in Germany.

Supreme Court upholds anti-suit injunction in support of a foreign seated arbitration

Introduction

In our Dispute Resolution Yearbook article Anti-suit injunctions for foreign seated arbitrations – a closing door?, we discussed the Court of Appeal's decision in UniCredit -v- RusChemAlliance[1] in which the Court of Appeal granted a final anti-suit injunction (ASI) restraining RusChemAlliance LLA (RCA) from pursuing court proceedings in Russia, in breach of a Paris-seated arbitration agreement. The Court of Appeal's judgment was the first time that the English Courts had ordered, on a contested basis, that England was the proper place to bring a claim for an ASI in respect of a foreign-seated arbitration clause.

HMRC confirms hardline approach for when securities fall within employment tax anti-avoidance regime

HMRC has today updated its guidance on the UK's employment-related securities (ERS) rules which can tax, as employment income, benefits arising to employees from securities deriving from their employment.  For these purposes, directorships count as employment and, broadly, securities derive from employment if the right or opportunity to acquire them is, actually, available by reason of the employee's employment. On top of this factual causation test, there is a long-standing deeming provision which, essentially, says that if a security is made available by a person's employer or a person connected with the employer, it will be an ERS (unless awarded due to domestic, family or personal relationships).  

Real Estate Autumn Briefing

In this briefing, we focus on four areas of law and practice which have seen interesting recent changes: landlord and tenant; nuisance; real estate development; and protest. Our briefing explores some of the ways in which the real estate sector continues to be impacted by, and to respond to, challenges around energy efficiency; housing rights and safety; water management; environmental protection; and the right to protest.

Hot or Cold? The European Court of Human Rights' recent decisions in climate change and human rights cases

Earlier this year, the European Court of Human Rights (the "ECtHR") delivered three judgments on the application of the European Convention on Human Rights ("Convention") in the climate change context. Whilst two of these cases (Agostinho[1] and Carême[2]) were ruled inadmissible on procedural grounds, in the case of KlimaSeniorinnen[3], the ECtHR found a violation of Convention rights in relation to climate change and outlined positive obligations on all State Parties to the Convention, including the UK, to mitigate climate change.

Back To Top