Knowledge

Our knowledge resources reflect the breadth and depth of our expertise, our insight into the issues which matter to your business, and our understanding of the markets in which you operate.

Knowledge

<p>Filter Knowledge</p>

301 Results

No damages 4u: termination and claims for future loss of bargain

In Phones 4u Ltd (In Administration) v EE Ltd (2018), the High Court struck out EE's claim for £200 million in damages because of the wording of a letter terminating its distribution arrangements with Phones 4u. The letter was effective in terminating the relevant contract only in exercise of EE's right under a contractual provision allowing termination for insolvency - and not for alleged repudiatory breach by Phones 4u under common law.

Terms of a termination letter defeat claim for loss of bargain damages

In Phones 4U Ltd (In Administration) –v- EE Ltd [2018] EWHC 49 (Comm), the High Court ruled that EE's counterclaim for damages for loss of bargain had no real prospect of success on the basis that the terms of a termination letter sent by EE were effective in terminating the relevant contract only in exercise of its right under a contractual provision and not in the acceptance of an alleged repudiatory breach by Phones 4U under common law.

Success for Minority Shareholder in Football Unfair Prejudice Petition

In VB Football Assets -v- Blackpool Football Club (Properties) Limited (formerly Segesta Limited) & Others [2017] EWHC 2767 (Ch), the High Court ordered that the majority shareholder of Blackpool Football Club Limited (Blackpool FC) purchase the minority shareholder's entire interest in the company, following the minority shareholder's successful petition alleging unfair prejudice.

Back To Top