Knowledge

Our knowledge resources reflect the breadth and depth of our expertise, our insight into the issues which matter to your business, and our understanding of the markets in which you operate.

Knowledge

<p>Filter Knowledge</p>

  • Filter Knowledge

    Articles Filtering:
    Select
    Select
    Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    Better Regulation
    Beyond Brexit
    Commonhold and Leasehold Reform
    COP29
    Covid-19
    Crypto disputes
    Derivatives & Structured Finance Disputes
    EEA Timeline
    ESG
    Graduate Recruitment
    International
    Pricing and payment
    QAHCs
    Regulatory reform
    Sanctions Updates
    Software Snapshots
    US Election 2024
    Select
    Select
    Press releases
    News
    Article
    Legal briefing
    Video
    Podcast
    Infographic
    Deal
    Publication

246 Results

Between a Rock and a hard place?

At first sight, the message of the Supreme Court's recent judgment in Rock Advertising v MWB seems simple: if you want to vary your contract, make sure you get it in writing. But in attempting to create greater certainty in this area, the Supreme Court may have created a new set of problems - particularly for businesses wishing to amend large numbers of contracts at the same time.

No damages 4u: termination and claims for future loss of bargain

In Phones 4u Ltd (In Administration) v EE Ltd (2018), the High Court struck out EE's claim for £200 million in damages because of the wording of a letter terminating its distribution arrangements with Phones 4u. The letter was effective in terminating the relevant contract only in exercise of EE's right under a contractual provision allowing termination for insolvency - and not for alleged repudiatory breach by Phones 4u under common law.

Terms of a termination letter defeat claim for loss of bargain damages

In Phones 4U Ltd (In Administration) –v- EE Ltd [2018] EWHC 49 (Comm), the High Court ruled that EE's counterclaim for damages for loss of bargain had no real prospect of success on the basis that the terms of a termination letter sent by EE were effective in terminating the relevant contract only in exercise of its right under a contractual provision and not in the acceptance of an alleged repudiatory breach by Phones 4U under common law.

Travers Smith advises ETF Securities Limited on the acquisitions of its exchange-traded products businesses

Travers Smith LLP has advised longstanding client ETF Securities Limited on both the $611 million sale of its European exchange-traded commodity, currency and short-and-leveraged business to WisdomTree Investments, Inc., and the sale of its Canvas, UCITS ETF platform, to Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM).

Travers Smith advises Bridgepoint on its acquisition of the master franchise of Burger King® in the UK

Travers Smith LLP has advised long-standing client Bridgepoint on its agreement with Burger King Europe GmbH (BKE), an affiliate of Restaurant Brands International Inc. (RBI), to become the UK master franchisee of BURGER KING®, with exclusive rights to the brand in the UK. Bridgepoint will simultaneously acquire the Caspian UK Group, one of the UK’s largest BURGER KING® franchisees with 74 restaurants.

The devil is in paragraph 3.2.2.2 (ii): contracts and inconsistency

What if the main body of a contract appears to say one thing, but the detailed wording of a technical schedule appears to be at odds with that? You might have thought that the main body of the contract would take precedence – but a recent Supreme Court ruling suggests otherwise.

Exclusivity: some do's and don'ts

All too often, businesses believe that they have secured a valuable commitment to exclusivity – only to discover that, when they come to enforce it, the relevant contractual provisions aren't watertight. In this briefing, we look at how to avoid the most common pitfalls and ensure that your exclusivity provisions achieve your commercial objectives.

Ancala to acquire Apache stake in Scottish Area Gas Evacuation system and Beryl Pipeline

Travers Smith LLP has acted for Ancala Midstream Acquisitions Limited (“Ancala”), which has entered into an agreement with Apache Beryl I Limited (“Apache”) to acquire Apache’s 30.28 per cent interest in the Scottish Area Gas Evacuation system (“SAGE”) and its 60.56 per cent interest in the Beryl pipeline – both of which are located in the North Sea.

Back To Top Back To Top chevron up