Court of Appeal gives narrow interpretation of "significant influence" exclusion from salaried members rules
In its recent judgment in HMRC v BlueCrest Capital Management (UK) LLP, the Court of Appeal has overturned the decisions of the lower tribunals and supported HMRC's narrow interpretation of "significant influence". In doing so, the Court introduced a new focus on the source of a member's influence, holding that the only influence that counts is that derived from legal rights and duties. In addition, the Court appeared to support HMRC's view that the scope of significant influence is limited to strategic influence over the affairs of the LLP generally.