Our knowledge resources reflect the breadth and depth of our expertise, our insight into the issues which matter to your business, and our understanding of the markets in which you operate.
With the Labour Party winning a landslide in the 2024 General Election, the UK is likely to see significant changes to employment law. In the leadup to the election, the Labour party promised the "biggest upgrade to rights at work for a generation".
Despite continued global economic and geopolitical uncertainty, and with the UK general election today, H1 2024 has seen improved levels of public M&A activity in the UK. There was a total of 30 firm offers announced in H1 2024 for UK public companies listed on the Main Market or AIM (25 in H1 2023). A further 10 public companies are currently subject to a 28-day put up or shut up (PUSU) period, and there have been six formal sale processes.
This briefing is for trustees and managers of DC occupational pension schemes. It outlines the latest legal developments and ongoing initiatives in the DC world, with links to issues of our regular publication 'What's Happening in Pensions' (WHiP) and other resources for those who want to read more.
In February 2024, the Law Commission published – by way of a short consultation – its draft Property (Digital Assets etc) Bill (the Bill).
A regular briefing for the alternative asset management industry.
In this podcast, corporate, employment and tax lawyers discuss some of the ESG policies featured in the manifestos of the political parties.
Artificial intelligence tools can be a game changer in outsourcing and other contracts for services - promising big wins in terms of costs, time, accuracy, scalability and productivity, to benefit both sides of the negotiating table. To reap those benefits, it is important to stay on top of the "new" risks associated with the use of AI in these arrangements.
In commercial contracts, the terms of payment are usually a key element of the parties' bargain – so if a customer fails to pay a material sum on time, then surely the supplier should have a right to terminate the contract? Quite possibly, but in practice it may not be as straightforward as this – and if the supplier reaches for the "big red termination button" prematurely, without a careful assessment of its rights, it can be a costly mis-step.
In its decision dismissing the appeal against the Competition Appeal Tribunal's ("CAT" or "Tribunal") order for two Defendant groups to use a single joint expert at trial, the Court of Appeal has made clear that the Tribunal's duty to restrict expert evidence to that which is reasonably required to resolve the dispute is the paramount consideration. While the issues of proportionality and the potential for conflicts of interest are relevant considerations in determining whether separate experts are required, those considerations must be assessed against the requirement to dispose of cases justly.
Welcome to the third episode in our Sustainability Insights ... in conversation series.
The UK Government has repeatedly emphasised its aim to remain "proportionate and well-targeted" and as "pro-business and pro-investment as possible" through its operation of the National Security and Investment Act (NSIA) regime.
Welcome to the fifth episode in our series of podcasts exploring the key legal issues relating to the development and use of artificial intelligence.
With the general election now set for 4 July 2024, the main political parties have released their election manifestos. Below we summarise the key pledges of the main political parties relating to employment law and business immigration.
In a further twist of the MUR Shipping BV v RTI Ltd proceedings, the Supreme Court has overturned the Court of Appeal's decision and ruled that a "reasonable endeavours" proviso in a force majeure clause does not require a party to accept non-contractual performance. The judgment has important implications for the drafting and interpretation of force majeure clauses generally – and the impact of sanctions in particular.
Judgment was handed down last week on the substantial directors' duties and wrongful trading claims brought against former directors of various BHS companies[1]. The liquidators of those companies were successful in arguing that the directors were liable for wrongful trading (albeit at the latest date of six possible dates argued) and were also successful in bringing the first ever claim for "misfeasance trading"[2]. Whilst the judgment is very fact specific, it is an interesting analysis of so-called "insolvency-deepening" activity and shareholder value extraction. Moreover, it is a salient reminder to directors of their duties where they are operating in the zone of insolvency.
Find the latest news, views and our analysis of all the key announcements.
A regular briefing for the alternative asset management industry.
Welcome to the fourth episode in our series of podcasts exploring the key legal issues relating to the development and use of artificial intelligence.
What does the new Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act mean for private litigation? Whilst the Act shifts the dial forwards in some respects (including by adding clout to the relief available for certain competition law breaches, and by introducing a mechanism for damages to be claimed for breaches of the new digital regulatory regime), there are also some notable omissions.